I write this while at 30,000 feet flying from the high tech
environment of Silicon Valley and the Stanford Medicine X conference to the suburbs
of Chicago for the Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO) meeting. One
could not get more contrast going from the beauty of the Stanford campus and
their high tech auditoriums and lecture halls to the windowless conference
rooms of a suburban hotel. Yet the two
meetings are similar. Both are indicative
of the positive changes occurring in healthcare these days. We are starting to
break out of our concrete silos in order to address patient care from the
patient's point of view. It seems radical and that alone is indicative of where we have gone wrong up until now.
At Medicine X, many of the discussions were led by patients
or included patients who have found their voices through the blogosphere and
through organizations such as Accolade which help people become more empowered
patients. They are partners in their
care – patients who spoke of their own struggles to be seen as autonomous
individuals and not as diseases. At the session I moderated, Mary Reese, who
suffered with chronic pain for 11 years spoke about her frustration of having
physicians not believe her pain was real, dismiss her ideas and concerns, and
fail to find any solutions. To her credit, she always maintained respect for
those physicians and believed that they were acting to the best of their
abilities. Not once did she blame anyone for her predicament. Instead she spoke
of her struggles to be a good mother despite her difficulty just standing up
and walking and the loss of the ability to do all the things she enjoyed doing.
She then spoke of the human connection she was able to form with Karen, at
Accolade who in turn helped her find her voice and helped her find the right
medical resources to finally end the 11 year nightmare.
While the conference stresses technology, this year the
technology was presented as a tool to best be kept in the background with
patients like Mary in the foreground. The patients are using expert systems and
new approaches which are all but invisible to them so that simplicity can
reign. Mary was able to access the
skills of Accolade and the expert opinions of Grand Rounds, both of which are made
possible by combining technology and humanism in a powerful way. She is now
enjoying her life, free of the debilitating pain. She brought tears to everyone' eyes as she
expressed her love for her supportive husband and children who stood by her
during that dark decade of pain.
This dichotomy between technology and humanism is being torn
down as we appreciate the facilitating potential for technology within the
humanistic paradigm. Touching people as
people who have unique needs and wants and not as a set of symptoms or a
standardized disease is required to build trust and create effective care. The
newer approaches highlighted at Medicine X recognize this need to break the
shackles of old paradigms.
In the same way, at HERO, the emphasis has traditionally
been on prevention. Research to determine the best ways to effect improvement
in diet, stress management, exercise, smoking cessation, and other lifestyle
challenges to prevent disease has been the main focus. That focus has sometimes
created suspicion that it could create a tendency to blame the patient for the
disease. I have sat in HERO meetings with
groups that advocate for those with diabetes, heart disease, and arthritis
during which those activists rightly pointed out the danger of stating that
everything is preventable with the proper lifestyle approach. That “everything is preventable” myth could easily
lead to regulations, laws and benefit requirements that impose harsh penalties
for being unsuccessful in addressing behavior change as part of treating a disease.
At this meeting however, I will take the podium with Dr Adam
Perlman, Executive Director of Duke Integrative Medicine and Associate Vice
President for Health and Wellness at Duke University Health System to discuss
how prevention techniques can be used effectively within therapeutics for
people with illness. We will challenge the model of every illness being preventable and instead offer a model which uses diet, stress reduction, exercise, and mindfulness both in the context of treating disease and for improvement of well-being for those without disease. Instead of treating the risk factor or the specific illness, new models will emphasize helping the person fulfill their own needs. We will present a new model in which the biomedical is combined
with an integrative model and an assistance model so that the patient point of
view, regardless of presence of illness, becomes paramount. The old silos
between prevention, wellness, and therapeutics must go. The concept of disease has to change as we
realize that our journey of life is dynamic.
Disease may be too static, too limiting, and may not adequately
recognize that the same disease may impact different people in different ways
at different times. We need to make these changes using technology but never
allow technology to get in the way of the person’s feelings, needs, beliefs and
values.
The fact is, unique individuals who get up every day, love
and care for their families, enjoy life and get sick must be
helped using every tool in the health, technology, medical and social arsenal.
They must maintain their dignity and their autonomy and be partners in all
efforts whether those efforts are preventive, therapeutic or supportive. They
cannot be forced to find fragmented programs and services through Internet
search or desperate attempts at networking.
We have a long way to go in breaking down the silos and
reaching the core humanism that must drive healthcare. The road will be
difficult as the voices of those who look for science, or prevention or technology
to be the only answer may dominate at times. However meetings like Medicine X
and HERO make me optimistic that we are moving in the right direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment